🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.